Friday, January 18, 2008

Thoughts on Evolution

What is it about the idea of evolution that so excites passion. The whole debate is very polarized. Either you are for evolution or against it. If for, then that means that there is no role of God in the start and development of life. Everything is blind chance. If against, then you are against science and rational thought and are a blinkered idiot living in a fantasy. I am currently reading The Fifth Miracle by Paul Davies who seeks to explain the origin of life as a result of purely worldly forces. What I've read so far, all the arguments presented are extremely convoluted. Indeed it is easier to invoke the divine as the source for the origin of life than to jump through complicated hoops seeking a purely non-divine explanation.

However, to get back to my earlier point, why is the debate so polarized? Why are extreme positions taken? Why does religion raise hackles?

One thing should be noted. This is a purely Western debate. Its origins and nearly all the protagonists hail from a West influenced paradigm. The fact that the rest of the world follows this same paradigm denotes the success that Western colonialism had in destroying indigenous structures and ideas.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

Dynastic Politics

The infantilism of Pakistan's political parties is amazing. Take the case of the Pakistan Peoples Party. Here is an organization that has been in existence for over 30 years and still it cannot let go of the teat of the Bhutto family.

The party was founded by one Bhutto, passed on to another and now has been bequeathed to a third. Forget about merit, credentials, intelligence or even having taken hard knocks for the party. All are supposed to quietly toe the line and accept this farce. Ironically, the most democratic party is one which is perceived to be the least democratic. Jamaat-e-Islami, for all its flaws, holds regular elections for the central committee and the party chairmanship. And these elections are not foregone conclusions either.